Cat’s Cradle Blog 2: Form and Genre

satireCat’s Cradle proves to be an extremely complex work of fiction that manages to shed light on real, relevant social issues in a way that is entertaining, and even humorous to the reader, despite the issues that are brought to light being potentially uncomfortable to think about. While it can be argued that Cat’s Cradle falls into several different genres, due to both its unique style and execution, the aforementioned characteristic primarily points towards the genre and conventions of satire. Satire exists for this very reason, to use humor and entertainment to either insight some sort of change, or at least bring the audience to further think about and investigate societal issues that might otherwise go unattended to. One of the primary sets of controlling values that we identified in blog 1, the idea of either seeking the truth at the risk of one’s own happiness and/or comfort, and living in the comfort of a lie while accepting that it is in fact a lie, speaks as to why this genre needs to exist in the first place. Many people may be tempted to ignore issues for the sake of complacency and comfort, but satire serves as a way to effectively trick this target demographic to see through to the other side, and perhaps allow them to see the truth without sacrificing their comfort or happiness.

Aside from this element of satire, Cat’s Cradle relies heavily on the conventions of science fiction, such as a futuristic setting relative to the time period the book was produced, and the invention of new technologies, lexicon, and organizations. Science fiction is a genre that combines extremely well with the elements of satire for the very reason that science fiction exists in the first place, exploring “what if” scenarios and satisfying the innate human element of curiosity/innovation.

The conventions of both satire and science fiction is one form used in Cat’s Cradle, but another form found in the book is the qualitative progressive form. As Burke discusses in his Lexicon Rhetorica, qualitative progressive form is “the presence of one quality prepares us for the introduction of another” (125). One example would be foreshadowing, but the form calls for more than one insistance. In Cat’s Cradle, Jonah sets up a qualitative progressive form when he introduces us to the idea of his Karass (the network of people your life becomes tangled with in order to complete the tasks God meant for you). Jonah tells the reader that his karass “includes the three children of Dr. Felix Hoenikker” (6). By doing so, Jonah is establishing a mood of anticipation. The reader knows that Jonah will be tangled up with the Hoenikker children (Newt, Angela, and Frank) and they are constantly waiting for the moment where the convergence of these characters finally happen. Jonah repeatedly has close, but not full, encounters with the Hoenikker children, like Newt writing Jonah a letter or people in Ilium talking about them, which build the anticipation. Then finally when they meet on a plane ride by chance, Jonah goes to talk to them, and the reader feels a sense of completion or satisfaction. That mood would not be possible if the reader had not been placed in a state of anticipation before. Newt even happens to be drinking champagne, making the meeting feel like a celebration.

antcipation

But then, Jonah says “The little son of a bitch had a crystal of ice-nine in a thermos in his luggage” (111). Oh yeah, nothing is actually resolved because  world ending ice-nine substance Jonah also warned us about is still out in the world, which Jonah on the plane doesn’t know about, and the karass hasn’t actually done anything they are suppose to. So in a sentence the reader gone from that fleeting sense of resolution back to anticipation. The qualitative progressive form created by the repeated idea of the karass takes the reader through the spectrum of anticipation and resolution. But there is another spectrum created of being given answers and then asking questions. For example, Jonah  gives us an answer in the previous quote, “The little son of a bitch had a crystal of ice-nine in a thermos in his luggage.” Repeatedly Jonah tells the reader that the Hoenikker children have ice-nine. The answer to the mystery of where is Dr. Hoenikker deadliest weapon is already given to us, but because the answer leads the reader to ask more questions. What are the Hoenikkers going to do with it? How will Jonah discover they have it? Will someone release it upon the world? The qualitative progressive form is taking the reader along the spectrum that the genre of satire wants the reader to take–to question. Satire wants to make us think, often about issues that we do not wish to. By giving the reader some of the answers, the qualitative progressive form in Cat’s Cradle is preparing the reader to ask the questions they might not have wanted to ask.

While the narrator is searching for his own truth, so is the reader. In this way, the narrator is almost meant to be a stand-in for the average reader, or target demographic for which the form is directed at. Not only does this make the narrator immediately relatable in an emotional sense for the reader, but it also means that the reader is inherently thrown into the struggle between the opposing controlling values along with the narrator. Considering the discussed intention of satire, to introduce potentially unsuspecting readers to potentially uncomfortable ideas or situations in the hopes of inciting some sort of cultural change or recognition of an issue, this means that the form serves to accomplish the goal of the genre and specific novel very well.

By Jordan

3 thoughts on “Cat’s Cradle Blog 2: Form and Genre

  1. When you stated, ‘Considering the discussed intention of satire, to introduce potentially unsuspecting readers to potentially uncomfortable ideas or situations in the hopes of inciting some sort of cultural change or recognition of an issue…’ it really got me thinking. It is common in our culture today to dismiss things that is different than the norm, as odd or unusual without giving it much thought. Instead of taking the time to question things, it is easier to react by labeling it weird and moving on. This is portrayed in the text when Jonah is touring Dr.Honikker’s office with Miss Faust. They see the room is a mess scattered with ten cent toys that he used for his experiments and unopened letters on his desk. Jonah notices a framed photograph on the desk and asks if it was a picture of his wife or his children. He responds in that way because having a picture of your family on your desk is something that is also common in our culture today. Instead we as readers are shocked to discover that the photograph does not include his family or himself but a war memorial. P.57
    “That was one of his hobbies,” said Miss Faust.
    “What was?”
    “Photographing how cannonballs are stacked on different courthouse lawns. Apparently, how they’ve got them stacked in that picture is very unusual.”
    “I see.”
    “He was an unusual man.”
    We see that Miss Faust is able to dismiss Dr. H. was an unusual man and not give it any other thought. This aligns with the network of controlling values that we came up with for this book in class. (context: Not questioning anything leads to ignorance and believing lies.) I think that Vonnegut included this characteristic into the text to make the reader reanalyze their own responses to odd situations. It makes you wonder how many times you brush things off without dealing with them. Her nonchalant attitude towards the Dr. H’s corky ways is a way that many of us would respond to an unfamiliar situation. Even if we would not respond in this way, it is still realistic enough that we could step into that role and play the part. It creates for us the context to evaluate the ways in which we react to things around us and maybe change our reactions in the future.

    Like

  2. Laura and Jordan, you guys did a good job putting this blog together.

    I think our narrator is telling this story of him writing a book about Dr. Hoenikker, but at the same time is teaching us about Bokonon. He opens his argument with the line, “Nothing in this book is true.” and follows it with a line from The Books of Bokonon. I: 5. He sets us up with this statement that nothing is true followed by some statement about harmless untruths, then he actually gets into the story. I think this is the syllogistic progressive form. He then drops little things about Bokonon while telling the story of his book about the day the bomb dropped. It seems like he’s is trying to convince us that this made up sounding religion is real and has merit in the world.

    Ice Nine is also Syllogistic progressive form. It is introduced in the beginning that it has the power to end the world, then in the end it does just that. By dropping hints throughout the book about who has ice-nine, where it is in the story, and how it comes to end the world, the reader is following the progression and has an idea that ice-nine may end the world.

    Like

  3. thecinemanblogs

    Great job guys! This blog is very insightful and thorough. I wanted to focus on the Conventional form of Bokononism.
    “A convention is a formal structure understood as acceptable by a group of people, and any such convention is determined by generic expectations. A given convention is simply what people who belong within a given genre do in a certain situation.”

    The religion Bokonon created is a convention Bokononists (like Jonah and the Hoenekkers) accept. The religion has specific expectations that they all accept:
    – “All the true things I am about to tell you are shameless lies.” This is the mantra of the religion. If you accept that whatever Bokonon says are lies, and you choose believe them, then they will be true. Jonah tells us that his book is full of lies, and yet, we choose to invest ourselves in it, initially taking everything that happens as true accounts.
    – “We Bokononists believe that humanity is organized into teams, teams that do God’s Will without ever discovering what they are doing. Such a team is called a karass by Bokonon, and the instrument, the kan-kan” . later on it also says, “a karass ignores national, institutional, occupational, familial, and class boundaries.” Throughout the book, Jonah meets with many different people, and mentions if they are in his karass (like the Hoenekker children), could have been in (for those people who were not Bokononists), and those he knew couldn’t be in his group. We barely know how the groups are formed, but the characters accept that they are together, even though they don’t know what they are doing.

    -Alex

    Like

Leave a comment